Devolving Capitalism, 2050

Summary: This working document provides build notes for the theme: Capitalisms Meet Climate Change, 2050. Please see the disclaimer, below.

Note: This raw but overloaded page transcends the work of college teaching, graduate and undergraduate, contained in this website.

Goals & Mission

This site gathers working notes to understand the direct conflict between capitalism and Climate Catastrophe, Impacts, and Responses (CCIR). The project attempts to define a strategy to re-frame capitalism so as to disclose a path to shrink and invert capitalism. Since capitalism is now extensively questioned and support for capitalism dwindling, interrogating capitalism could reveal helpful strategies toward a just and sustainable future. The popular understanding of capitalism typically rests on ideology (both left and right). However, a deeper, longer term, dynamic approach aimed at feasible strategy could alleviate much suffering. So doing is why I put forward this project.

Thus, I agree with Naomi Klein's important book, This Changes Everything, meaning that climate change and capitalism cannot coexist for much longer --- reckoned in decades, not centuries. However, capitalism contains inherent contradictions and external vulnerabilites, that could exceed its impressive adatpive capacity. This could include morphing into a rogue regime. The challenges and the stakes are high.

My method will be to present critical specullation as to how this drama couldl unfold in the long term, to 2050 --- roughly a generation from now (May, 2019). Complex, comprehensive, global, long-term speculation is rare (Randers).This speculation will contain three parts:

  1. Part one explains the current dilemma as capitalisms break down and as climate change looms. The time horizon of 2050 provides but a single generation to rectify what could be a global catastrophe. You will find little optimism here, as expressed in my long-term mission, my Statement of Concern, first composed
  2. in 2007. Two segments contain the emerging dilemma:
    1. Capitalisms Breaking Down, the first part, will explain the flaws and vulnerabilites inherent in capitalism. I will focus on the dominant power, now in decline, the USA under a neoliberal regime, the purest form of neoliberal capitalism. Other forms exist such as the EU and the rising superpower, China, pulling Asia with it. Since capitalism typically does not see the long term, climate change, its impacts, and its responses willl be ignored in favor of what capitalism seeks: profit, typically in the short term.
    2. Global Warming, Impacts, and Responses (GWIR) framed as the legitimate science, the IPCC version and its offshoots, not the iddeological distortions; the impacts, now poorly understood at a granular (down-to-earth) level; and the responses, likely to be perverse as lurking crony capitalism forestalls remidation. However, the sheer economic cost of climate disruptions, the needed infrastructure (Naomi Klein's Disaster Capitalism will proft and lobby) but the potential for a genuine remedy outside capitalism and the instrumentialism of anthropomorphism will be contested..
  3. In part two, I offer a reframing around a Livelihood Devolution of the economy and then the world social ecology:
    1. The global economy is now under the spell of capitalism as a total world system. This hierarchy must be inverted, consistent with the magesterial historical tomes of Fernand Braudel, with a dynamic contributed by Karl Polanyi --- both economic historians of distinction who speak to us today.
    2. The perspective will then expand beyond the instrumentalism of economics into a fulsome world social ecology that opens a horizon beyond economics, materialism, hierarchy (including patriarchy), and instrumentalist anthropomorphism. The ends are simply life: humanity within nature. Another approach is that all life is a creation, making the whole effort caring for creation.
  4. The third part provides a parallel blog that posts events, cases, and data that support and illustrate the case made here.

I will synopsize the argument in the sections below, then link to work in progress.

Capitalism Breaking Down

Since the Great Recession of 2008-2009, confidence has been shaken in the financially dominated form of capitalism as seen in the USA and EU. Economic crisis spawned by financial bubbles appear to be an acccepted component of the notorious instability of the capitalist system in its pure forms. Howeever, given other grievances pile up, such as burgeoning inequality (and accompanying loss of support, especially generational) and the inability to acknowledge and address carbon externalities (sort of concern with the environment --- a misnomer that I will tackle later). So, I will break down these flaws and vulnerabilities (not all the cause of capitalism) into several categories that I will then explain more fully.

  1. Slowing economic growth (stagnation) can be anticipated as the workforce and its productivity faces long-term decline. A compelling argument is made by Robert J. Gordon on this significant trend. Since WWII, a global regime dedicated to monetized material growth (GDP)has dominated policy virtuallly worldwide. The rewards appear broadly shared until the mid-1970s, but has skewed toward the ultra-rich since, with the accompanying grasp of political power. Eventually, profits will shrink and capital accumulation with declining profit and, as we willl see below, much higher interest rates. Capitalism contains its own macro-economic dynamics. What goes up can go down, and probably will. Watch closely.
  2. World population levels off, approaching zero population growth (ZPG) in the richer nations of the northern hemisphere (OECD in the jargon of the United Nations). This means that fewer workers will be available (and may not be needed as technology advances) but that aggregate consumption may also level off --- and revenues for firms.
  3. Meanwhile, inequality within nations soars, excluding large portions of the citizenry from the gains of GDP and accumulation of wealth. Now, reactionary forces gather discontent, channeling resentmment toward such scapegoats as dispossessed refugees, the multitude of people seeking refuge as they travel from south to north --- an ugly spectacle. However, lower GDP nations and regions expand monetized economic activity and population faster than mature economies, so a worldwide convergence of GDP per capita is underway (Pikkety). The resulting "ecology of rich and poor" has the potential to intensify environmental justice concerns as the planet heats up and equitorial regions become uninhabitable.
  4. As governments, especially in the capitalist north (as opposed to mixed economies elsewhere) practice the political expedience of deficit spending of the Keynesian model along with largely hidden expansions of military forces and imported arsenals. Such deficit spending creates national debt surges, especially since the low-interest rates since 2008. Inextricably, fiscal crises will propel austerity on deprived citizenry. Neglected roads, airports, bridges and other civil engineering infrastructure will fester and decay. The rich, gathering in armored enclaves, will separate from the Others, creating a need to suppress democracy and control restless populations. The rising interest rates and potential for inflation will not contribute to GDP growth or business invesment, thus gains in productivity.
  5. Then along comes climate change, its largely unknown global and regional impacts, and the stiffening resistance to prevention thrown up by the ideology of denial backed by the Dark Money that benefits from what Naomi Klein dubs Disaster Capitalism. Demands for "armoring" cities and regions with dikes and walls will intensify as will calls for assistance with the damage of other "natural" disasters such as floods, tornadoes, fires, drought, crop losses, pest infestation, etc. Patropnage and pork will have another facet --- witness Puerto Rico. In a fiscal crisis, such luxuries can only go to the Social Darwinists who, ironically, created the havoc. More control, more military, more repression can be applied, for a while. The seminal Stern Report anticipates a decline of 5% to 8% of global GDP to respond to lost productivity and social overhead capital.
  6. Geopolitics will resemble earth's crust shifting on tectonic plates. The USA will be hard hit, with the fuller realization that despite high, but stagnating and inequitable, per capita income, its dashboard of indicators of well being, including longevity, infant and maternal mortality, happiness, and environmental stress put the USA behind most industrialized countries and even behind some developing nations (see Costa Rica and Cuba). Meanwhile, rising superpower China shifts awkwardly to a consumer-based economy despite its mounting piles of debt, and expands its influence through its Belt and Road colonization, along with the debt service and resource grabs it imposes on its client states. The EU stagnates. Southeast Asia, a mixed group, sees its denser and poorer nations (Bangladesh, Pakistan) deteriorate with climate damage. India, like China, a population and land mass giant, strains to control its internal ethnic, class, and regional disputes. Little cooperation on global warming or economic globalization can be anticipated.
  7. Despite all of this, the status of women will improve, but not necessarily within capitalisms, however practiced. In effect, the sheer potential and subjective will of this largely disvalued majority of humanity will surface as a force for participation, self-improvement, and justice. This trend is happening around us today, often hidden from view, crying out for disclosure, emulation, and sharing.

Build Note: Missing categories of events such as women, demos, geopolitics. I need a way of presenting:

  • longer list, such as commons, growing resistance (Bolsonaro, Trump), GK maybe but try for short list with complex interactions.
  • shorter narration here but need pages or even nodes for each item: Flexible iterations around structure + script + stub + iteration.

This must encapsulate the entire KBD. Need KBD-build page, citations. Set up for BPS as intermezzo, but Part II unclear:

  • Place LTG, so rich, after intermezzo, thus introducing systems dynamics.
  • Brundtland tradition placed after LTG, but both contradict the EG paradigm. Must then discuss in the context of BPS, so that belongs as intro to Part II, invert capitalism. Does geopolitics go here?
  • Culture from Laing? Keep short but cannot exclude.
  • Cities and regions feature export-base model, Jane Jacobs, Richard Florida, de Toqueville, Barber's Strong Democracy. Disheveled now.
  • Need policy catalog as I go.
  • LSi follows a logical progression, but culture goes before. LSi sets up
  • IE, SE, WSE, WST as a full blown alternative in utopian speculation.
  • Strategy has been set, so summarized here.

Obviously, Part II, invert capitalism, has not been thought through, particularly strategy.

2045 Project Web Site |
© Wayne Hayes, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Sustainability, Ramapo College | ™ ProfWork
Initialized: 10/27/2017 | Last Update: 04/20/2020 | V. 0.1, Build #1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.