The Washington Consensus and Neo-Liberalism |
|
---|---|
Refocused mission of Bretton Woods institutions |
In the 1980s, under pressure from Thatcher and Reagan, the World Bank joined the IMF in adopting a missionary zeal in pursuing neo-liberal policies, purging heretics from its staff, and installing a free market ideology called neo-liberalism. The World Bank integrated its operations with the IMF, but as a junior partner. |
Consequences of Bretton Woods Under the regime of Neo-liberalism |
Critics of the Washington Consensus recognize that Neo-Liberalism transformed the Bretton Wood accords from nationalism to globalism, weakining national sovereignty and providing a de facto regime of globalization that was neither transparent not democratic. This secured the ascendancy of economic globalization at the expense of national independence. Thus, corporatism trumps citizenship. |
The controversy surrounding Neo-liberalism and economic globalization |
Neo-liberalism projects that its policies will provide widely shared prosperity by inducing accelerated economic growth. The record says otherwise: global economic expansion was far higher, 3.2%, from 1961-1980, before neo-liberalism, than since the Thatcher- and Reagan-led initiatives were installed, 0.7% from 1981-1999 (Pollin 131). Further, global ecological deterioration has intensified and inequalities in income and wealth have sharpened. Half of humanity, three billion people, subsists on under $2 per day and the richest 20% consume 86% of the earth's resources (Shah 7). The number of people living in poverty actually increased in the 1990s (Stiglitz 5). The East Asian financial collapse of 1997-1998 -- the Asian Flu -- shook faith in the international monetary regime. South America has rejected structural adjustment programs. Africa has been largely excluded from economic globalization, contributing only about 4% to world trade, and poses special problems of AIDS, a colonial legacy, and race. The Islamic world resists the materialistic trappings of westernization. Oil, the foundational resource of modernization, exhibits chronic and irreversible scarcity -- Peak Oil. The global environment continues to deteriorate while global warming intensifies. (References in Hayes, Economic Strategies for Sustainability) |
The WTO occupies a strategic niche in the march of neo-liberalism and economic globalization. Fundamental to neo-liberalism is the aggressive abolition of impediments to unfettered trade among nations, facilitating the unhindered movement of goods, resources, currency, and investment, but not enabling migration. Neo-liberalism champions the rights of corporations to seek cheap resources, maximum profits, fluid investment opportunity, and expanded markets--all in the name of efficiency and the eventual gains accruing to all stakeholders. Anathema to neo-liberalism are tariffs; regulations of all kinds, such as labor and environmental standards; and restrictions on flows of currency, capital, and investment, even for unproductive speculation. Freedom in the context of neo-liberalism means abolition of all governmental oversight, even if popular and democratic. So, for some, the WTO represents liberty while for others it stands for domination by transnational corporations. ^